The
Damaged Books Room (Fantagraphics). Jonas Seaman
In fact, an exhibition has just opened at the Hunterian Museum at the University of Glasgow:
http://www.gla.ac.uk/hunterian/visit/exhibitions/exhibitionprogramme/comicinvention/#/whatisacomic?
EA and LG
Lucia Cedeira Serantes is an Assistant
Professor at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science (Queens
College, CUNY). She is currently working on expanding her thesis chapter on
reading and materiality. Her next research projects will explore non-readers’ relationship
to reading: trying to shed some light on the ways in which notions and
practices around reading are communicated and perpetuated and why and in what
ways youth modify or reject these ideas about “reading” as part of their
identity development.
As many other PhD students before me, after a
year into the program I felt the urge to move away from the very topic that
brought me to the program. That move provoked a mixture of anxiety and
excitement but I quickly found a new path, thanks to much reading and the
patience and guidance of my supervisors. My interest in the reading experience,
and comics readers in particular, grew from different projects I engaged in, with
some ending up making it into the academic world (Cedeira Serantes, 2013) and
others making up much of that invisible and laborious work that researchers do.
So why comics and reading? Basically I thought that there were more to comics
readers than what I was seeing represented in the Media Studies (with their
focus on fans) and Education and Library and Information Science (LIS) literature
(with their focus on reluctant and/or visual readers).
Historically comics have been a very popular
reading material for youth in spite of the attacks and poor consideration
received from adults and educational and cultural institutions. Most of the
research efforts have focused on analyzing texts—especially lately in terms of
regarding comics as good
literature—along with a consideration of comics as a text and product in the
fan experience. I wanted to move the focus from fan communities and comics as
texts to readers. My research focus was comics readers and how they constructed
and understood their reading experience of comics as a reading material and
what this revealed about reader identities and social contexts of reading. This
focus exposes my academic influences, who deserve a direct acknowledgement:
Radway (1991) who sparked my interesting for neglected readers; Mackey (2011)
and Ross, McKechnie & Rothbauer (2006) who solidified the project; and Gemma Lluch
and Fuller & Rehberg Sedo (2013) who keep expanding my horizons.
In the spirit of full disclosure, my own personal history as a reader of
comics made me rather open-minded and attentive to the possibility of a multiplicity
of experiences. I am originally from Spain and as a child I read 13, Rue del Percebe by Francisco Ibañez, Astérix by Goscinny and Uderzo, and El Capitán Trueno by Mora and Ambrós. As a teenager my taste
moved towards superheroes and the X-Men group became one of my favourites. In
university, my engagement with comics faded away and the only contact I had was
through the magazine El Vibora
until my MLIS studies when Maus by Art Spiegelman
rekindled my love for comics. My reading history mixes genres, nationalities, and
formats and it was an (anecdotal) example of the differences that can
potentially affect the development of comics readership.
To keep the readers’ voices at the center of my
work, I adopted an approach informed by hermeneutical phenomenology that made
immediate the richness and multifaceted nature of the reading experience
(Cohen, Kahen and Steeves 2000; Kvale and Brinkmann 2009). I interviewed seventeen
participants, from sixteen to twenty-five years of age, nine female and eight
male, who also represented different reading experiences: beginning readers,
occasional but committed readers, and expert readers. I recruited participants
and collected data in three different sites: public libraries, comics stores
and at a university with a large undergraduate population.
The ideas, processes, and conclusions that emerged
from these interviews presented comics reading as a sophisticated practice with
unique characteristics and this group of diverse readers as committed,
conscientious, and reflexive. It also emphasized the situated nature of the
reading experience that requires the researcher to explore both how the
experience is shaped but also shapes the reader-self and how it is embedded in
an influential social context. Allow me to elaborate. The richness of the data
I worked with was such that I was constantly grappling with the temptation to
simplify their shared experiences: to separate what my readers were
experiencing as a whole into defined compartments that, as a researcher, would afford
me an easier analysis and presentation. I managed to fight this temptation
through a visual representation that, while not a model, brought together what
I ended up naming the four dimensions of the reading experience: 1) the construction of the
reader-self; 2) the significant role of the materiality of comics; 3) the
institutional contexts of comics reading and; 4) the unique temporal aspects of
comics reading in contemporary society.
I
recognize that the visual representation is not an epitome of clarity and I
often need to explain it, but as a tool, it helped me to keep the four
dimensions together and keep in mind the experiential complexity that my
readers were sharing. The first dimension (the reader-self) attempts to explore the
identity of the reader, that is constructed both solitarily and socially,
especially in connection with the comics community; gender and positive and
negative reading experiences are other key factors in the evolution of the
reader-self. The materiality question (the second dimension) was raised by my participants
and they helped to investigate how the change of media/format can potentially alter
our relationship to reading and to the reading material; they especially focused
on the affordances of print comics in comparison (not against) digital comics.
The third dimension revealed the importance that surrounding structures and institutions (the
comics industry, libraries, and educational institutions) have in the comics
reading experience and how they become sites where comics reading is introduced,
encouraged, or denigrated, directly or indirectly. Finally, the fourth dimension
refers to time and how these readers construct comics as complex narratives
that smoothly adapt to the temporal requirements connected to a current state
of time scarcity, acceleration, speed, and instantaneity; however, readers also
appreciated the quality of comics to allow for moments of contemplation (Cedeira
Serantes, forthcoming May 2016).
The knowledge emerging from these participants’ experiences and
understandings significantly enhances and seriously challenges commonplace
understandings of the reading practices of a historically neglected group of
readers. Previous posts by Erin Spring or Carolina González clearly reflect the opportunity
for reading research that looks at the meaning emerging from reading practices
and experiences as well as “newly discovered” formats such comics. The thoughts
and reflections that these YA readers shared advance and extend the knowledge
about the complexities of YA reading practices and support the necessity and
timeliness of introducing comics in libraries and other cultural and
educational institutions.
References:
Cedeira Serantes, L. 2013. Misfits,
loners, immature students, reluctant readers: Librarianship participates in the
construction of teen comics readers. In Transforming
young adult services: A reader for our age, edited by Anthony Bernier,
115-135. New York: Neal-Schuman.
Cedeira Serantes, L. forthcoming May 2016. When comics set the pace: The
experience of time and the reading of comics. In Plotting the Reading
Experience: Theory, Practice, Politics,
edited by Lynne Mckechnie, Paulette Rothbauer, Knut Oterholm, and Kjell Ivar Skjerdingstad. Waterloo,
Ontario Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Cohen, M. Z., David L. Kahn, and Richard H. Steeves. 2000. Hermeneutic
Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide for Nurse Researchers.
Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London; New Delhi: Sage.
Fuller, D., and DeNel Rehberg Sedo. 2013. Reading beyond the Book:
The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture. New York: Routledge.
Kvale,
S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative
Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mackey, M. 2011. Narrative Pleasures in
Young Adult Novels, Films, and Video Games. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Radway, J. A. 1991. Reading the Romance : Women, Patriarchy, and
Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Ross,
C. S., McKechnie, L., and P. M. Rothbauer. 2006. Reading Matters: What the
Research Reveals about Reading, Libraries, and Community. Westport, CT:
Libraries Unlimited
Important work, Lucia. This is pathbreaking research.
ResponderEliminar